Re: On having and using a Code of Conduct
On 15273 March 1977, Matthew Vernon wrote:
Appeals to the DPL wouldn't be compatible with the current
version of our constitution.
That is sort-of orthogonal to whether they'd be a good idea or
not :) Yes, I see that the constitution specifically prohibits
the DPL from withdrawing the delegation of a particular decision
and from over-ruling delegates. Presumably DAM could say "we
will voluntarily refer appeals to the DPL for their opinion and
do as the DPL says", but that might be too much of subverting
the intent of the constitution.
If we say that, we would speak against the constitution, as that
explicitly mentions DPL not having stuff to do with accounts
(8.1.2).
I'm not sure we really want to have people delegated just to
review DAM appeals...
No need for that. Footnote 3 of the expulsion procedure mail shows
one body we have.
--
bye, Joerg
The answer to life’s problems aren’t at the bottom of a beer
bottle, they’re on TV.
Reply to: