On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Mostly, I *personally* do not find those people authentic enough to > > > uphold any such community standard. It's somewhat like donating to a > > > species conservation organisation, taking the money from a purse made of > > > crocodile skin. It's quite impossible to take it seriously. > > Debian isn't advertised as a distribution whose main goal is to provide > > 100% free something while not providing anything non-free, > [...] > > Yeah it's such a minor goal that it's the first point of the Social > Contract. I'll quote it: "We will support people who create or use both free and non-free works on Debian." That is not the same as what I wrote but what I meant was we don't say things like "our community must actively reject the non-free counterparts" or "we will not distribute, recommend, or otherwise support non-free software", as some other distributions do. -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature