Re: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ... [forking practicalities]
Steve Langasek wrote:
> I have never seen [Sven] attempt to *make peace* with
> Frans, except as a strategy for regaining access to svn.
Is there any way Sven could attempt to do that now without it being seen
as a strategy for regaining access to svn?
Personally, I doubt it.
How functional is git's svnimport and so on? Would the powerpc builders
be open to using a git store upstream instead of d-i's svn, and someone
with d-i commit access be willing to merge changes back? I think that's
about the only route I can see that would let Sven Luther do powerpc
maintenance directly again.
Hopefully someone smarter will have a better suggestion. It's sad to
see so many clever people unwilling to go beyond calling for /ignore
svenl and sod the powerpc install. Is no-one smart enough to come up
with a way that's good enough to stem complaints from both sides?
Regards,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: