Re: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:48:14AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
Well, we had a chat with both Anthony and Sledge the other day, where i
explained my position, and asked for something to happen. I also sent them
some mail, and well, was positive that something will happen out of this.
But then, ...
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 06:40:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:13:12AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Right now, the problem, whatever the problem is, is not with me, [...]
>
> Sven, the problem is with you. It may not be wholly with you, but you're
> certainly the major contributor. Until you can accept that fact, things
> simply aren't going to improve for you.
Well, i am at a loss of what else to do, this is already the third time
Anthony failed in this mediation, and it still seems to me that i have often
and in all honestity accepted my part of the fault, but the other side in this
conflicts hasn't done so, and moreover insists that all the fault is on my
side.
I have compiled a new page on the wiki pages concerning this issue :
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/FransPopAndOthersVs.SvenLutherIssue/SvenLuther2
And am clearly at a loss on how to continue handling this. I will not mention
this anymore until fosdem, and hope it will be solved by then, but with
replies like anthony's above, and the ones from frans, joeyh, holger and geert
(even though the two latest have removed their wiki page about this), i fear
that even a face-to-face meeting almost 4 months from now will not help to
solve tis issue.
Anthony, you always wanted to handle this in private, but this was your 3rd
time, and i think that maybe the fact that this whole mess dragged on so long,
is in part your fault. I don't know why you take that position though, nor do
i know why the d-i folk behave as such, and why joeyh for example feels he
needs to stop all d-i participation if i regain d-i svn commit rights.
I am at a loss on how to continue handling on this.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: