On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Altough you are wrong, aj didn't really give a official position, To be clear: I gave my position, as DPL. That isn't the final position of the project, since it can also be appealed to the technical committee (which it subsequently has been), or considered by the developer body at large by general resolution. That does not make it any less "official" though. > to follow the d-i team's position without giving any valable explanation, and > clearly pointed that he considered the Technical Comitte and/or a GR the right > way to continue this. I don't think focussing on the reasons for the disagreement is useful, and I don't think going back to where we were two months ago will result in any useful improvement compared to how things actually progressed from two months ago. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature