Re: More polls and social pressure
Raphael Hertzog <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> If you only take into account "non-technical" stuff, you may be right.
> But then it's the same type of problematic as with architectures and
> porters... should a minority hold back the progress of the majority ?
No. However, majorities do not always choose progress.
> There are always discussions between both minorities and majorities, but
> then when there's no a agreement possible, should we be stuck because the
> discussion didn't led anywhere ?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Should a majority always win it? No.
> > Fewer secretarial roles, facilitation of non-technical GRs and
> > more official status to our summaries of technical choices.
> "Fewer secretarial roles" but do you think the secretary should hold
> them ?
I'm unsure. It would make for consistency and reduces the number
of people being flamed to a crisp (but we should reduce that anyway),
but maybe would concentrate power or overload the secretary.
> Why facilitate only "non-technical" GR ?
I meant "non-technical position statement". Editing error.
I don't think the quick turnaround is desirable for any of the
other types of GR.
> > I wondered what views other people have about the idea.
> I wonder too, but it looks like not many people are following that thread
> (and it's my fault, I shouldn't have put the controversial bit in the same
> discussion thread).
Better luck holding back from the drive-by flaming next time.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct