On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 04:10:04PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 02:13:12PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > In my experience, it is sometimes necessary to get somebody's > > attention, and it does sometimes work. The trick is one of > > judgement. I stand by mine and challenge anybody to show it to be > > significantly worse than the norm. > > You cheat: nothing can be significantly worse than your definition of > norm, therefore anything you do will always be justified. More unsubstantiated libel. It's telling how the people accusing me are the ones doing all the flaming. > > I find it significant that so far, nobody has even tried to do so. > > You claim that people aren't addressing your point in this thread. > Would you like to clarify better what you are interested in? Did you not read my original mail? I thought it quite clear. I'll repeat the relevant paragraph here: My response is simply this: it's lies. I challenge anybody who thinks otherwise to present evidence. I sign almost all my outgoing mails; this should be easy, if it were true. Find mails from me that "are little more than provocations, put-downs, and trolls". Not ones where people have interpreted it that way and I've either told them they're wrong or ignored them. Ones where it's actually true. Post references to this thread. See how many you *actually* get, out of the number of mails I send. And here's a link to the mail I pasted it from, in case you can't find your way up the thread view in your MUA: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2005/08/msg00074.html -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature