[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)

brian@debian.org (Brian Mays) writes:

> > Brian Mays <brian@debian.org> writes:
> > > Surely you do not believe this, do you?  There will ALWAYS be useful
> > > software (at least, useful to someone) with licenses that fail our
> > > somewhat arbitrary criteria for what we consider to be free.
> Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@mit.edu> replied:
> > Does the phrase "somewhat arbitrary" denote your respect for and
> > agreement with the DFSG?
> This phrase is neutral, a statement of fact.  The DSFG as it exists
> today is the result of compromise.  I have always felt that compromise
> is good.

I intended my comment as humorous, and I fear it might not have been
taken that way.  No disrespect was intended.

Reply to: