Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)
> Brian Mays <email@example.com> writes:
> > Surely you do not believe this, do you? There will ALWAYS be useful
> > software (at least, useful to someone) with licenses that fail our
> > somewhat arbitrary criteria for what we consider to be free.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <firstname.lastname@example.org> replied:
> Does the phrase "somewhat arbitrary" denote your respect for and
> agreement with the DFSG?
This phrase is neutral, a statement of fact. The DSFG as it exists
today is the result of compromise. I have always felt that compromise