Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)
- To: Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free)
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 26 Jul 2000 13:06:32 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] u1h66ps4y93.fsf@alice-whacker.mit.edu>
- In-reply-to: Brian Mays's message of "Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:15:18 -0400"
- References: <873dmoyg2y.fsf@complete.org> <20000610172243.E25085@azure.humbug.org.au> <87bt19z3cj.fsf@complete.org> <20000611132938.B22350@silly.cloud.net.au> <87bt16xfcp.fsf@complete.org> <20000613183150.A4582@silly.cloud.net.au> <20000615133420.F1394@ecn.purdue.edu> <961099594.18ba99d2@debian.org> <20000615212342.C2066@ecn.purdue.edu> <20000616131518.1C218DFBE@ariel.local.net>
Brian Mays <brian@debian.org> writes:
> Surely you do not believe this, do you? There will ALWAYS be useful
> software (at least, useful to someone) with licenses that fail our
> somewhat arbitrary criteria for what we consider to be free.
Does the phrase "somewhat arbitrary" denote your respect for and
agreement with the DFSG?
Reply to: