Re: Not building for powerpc any more

[Rick Thomas <rbthomas55@pobox.com>]

Sven Luther wrote:

> Notice that the description speaks about a "mature" system, i don't
> think that something so endian-buggy that it won't build on  
> powerpc, and
> probably not also on the other bigendian arches, should use the term
> "mature" in its description.