On 23/11/2006, at 10:32 AM, Jan Stedehouder wrote:
One way to achieve this is by appointing a group of independent
arbiters that look into the matter, where both parties can present
their case and which can make a binding judgment. The judgment can be
-correct if I am wrong- the removal of the rights of the party to
which substantiated blame can attributed to or the removal of those
rights for both parties. If the community decided this is a good
thing and one or both parties refuse to cooperate... well, then it is
decided.
Yes, I think this is also the best way forward. Although, I might
advise that it is first best to make mediation non-binding and see if
both parties can voluntarily come to an understanding - something
which may take a few sessions. If this does fail, then only then do I
think we should make mediation binding.
I don't know the issue or the parties involved, so cannot volunteer,
sorry.
Torrance