Re: The powerpc port should be removed from etch release candidates ...
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:15:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:37AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:38:14PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > What I'm saying is that no amout of proof that they will not be able
> > > to meet the targets is relevant. What's relevant is actual failure to
> > > do so, not your (or anyone else's) prognostications.
> >
> > the d-i isos are broken, and had i not been there, they will probably have
> > been broken for another couple of month.
>
> As it happens, Frans had already noticed the problem and pinged me about
> it a few days ago, and I was just emerging from under a different pile
> of work so I had some time to look at it anyway. Failures in the d-i
> build logs don't go unnoticed, although I agree that this one took
> longer to fix than it should have done.
But nobody cared to inform the powerpc users, who where trying to use the
broken images on machines the april 1 build could not work.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: