Re: New perl packages uploaded to the SVN
On Dec 11, 2007 9:05 PM, Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm on the camp that prefers dh_* but does not really oppose
> CDBS - I use CDBS for my Ruby modules (because it's the group policy,
> go figure)... So, Vincent: Is there a good CDBS rules file that acts
> quite like our standard behaviour? (or going a couple of steps
> further: Like the four dh-make-perl variants? MakeMaker arch:all,
No, there are subtle differences, at least for the makemaker arch:any
which I tried a couple of days ago. Customising it to cater to our
needs should not be hard at all. I can give it a try, but I don't know
if anybody would be interested in using that.
> MakeMaker arch:any, Module::Build arch:all and Module::Build arch:any)
> If so, well... We could properly study and document them... And see if
> migration is possible/desirable :)
>
> It would _clearly_ reduce duplication. But yes, it would increase
> obscurity.
I have that common problem around here... I don't like documenting,
and I'm awfully slow when doing it. If that wasn't the case, I'd
already started writing a manual for cdbs, just not to hear once again
that cdbs is obscure ;-)
--
Martín Ferrari
Reply to: