Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Damyan Ivanov dijo [Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:50:55AM +0200]: > > (...) > > The only real showstopper is the maintainer field. Because of it, > > I am changing the distribution of all the packages to UNRELEASED in > > SVN so we can easily track them. > > > >  The rest will make it unlikely for me to upload as I'll have > > to do more changes, not just review. Discplaimer: not everyone in the > > group shares these preferences. > >  http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/qareport.cgi > > Heh, not all, but by far, most of us. Yes, please stay away from CDBS > for pkg-perl packages! And quilt/dpatch are great tools when you have > to work in a group, where not everybody understands the scope and > reasons of each of the patches you have applied. Well, I don't think we should generally preclude CDBS from being used in pkg-perl packages (even though I personally don't like CDBS). My one issue with CDBS, though, is that it's documented miserably. :-( Julian.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.