On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:43:50 +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote: > Well, I don't think we should generally preclude CDBS from being used in > pkg-perl packages (even though I personally don't like CDBS). My one > issue with CDBS, though, is that it's documented miserably. :-( I agree, a policy "forbidding" CDBS is not what I want; but stating the current situation as a matter of fact -- that most members don't like CDBS (for its black magic and lack of documentation) and that the probability for sponsorship is lowder therefore -- seems ok to me. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- BOFH excuse #276: U.S. Postal Service
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature