[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Perl packages LIE - Depends: perl (>= 5.8



Dariush Pietrzak <eyck@forumakad.pl> writes:
>>>  I thought I did exactly that. 
>> Well, you thought wrong.
>  That's your opinion,

Not only his opinion. You started with an upper-case "LIE" in the
subject, which is good sign for yet another idiot with some weird idea.

>> Specific examples in your original email would have helped, too, rather
>  This is very common issue, I have given one single example, I hoped for
> some reasonable response, sorry I hit someone emotionally sensitive, glad
> I'm in your killfile and this mushy thing is over.

Well, please provide your list of 60 packages you've mentioned and we'll
see if it is real problem. If you're right, we can try to fix it, but
it's probably too late to do this in sarge.

Marc
-- 
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse   # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>

Attachment: pgpZU5Ndx3ttr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: