Re: DM advocacy message for Martín Ferrari
On 8/7/07, Anibal Avelar <aavelar@cofradia.org> wrote:
> Yes, I know the debian-devel-announce mailing list, but efectively I'm
> not susbcribe on it.
>
> I think although should be good is not an obligation to subscribe on
> all list. I'm subscribe on many others.
As stated in [1], [2] and [3], Debian Developers are expected to be
subscribed to debian-devel-announce. People waiting in the NM queue,
specially if you are just waiting for DAM, are also expected to be
subscribed.
To be clear: you should be subscribed to it. There's no excuse to your
behaviour.
[1]: http://www.debian.org/devel/join/index.en.html
[2]: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s-mailing-lists
[3]: http://alioth.debian.org/plugins/scmcvs/cvsweb.php/templates/nm_pp2.txt?rev=1.15;cvsroot=nm-templates
> I think the better way is to do the announce in debian-devel-announce,
> but when we need to send in other list to write a reference (or link)
> about what announce or new resolution we are talking about.
The better way for what?
We are not going to be including links to messages for devel-announce
when talking about something that has just happened and all the people
subscribed to the list are expected to have read it.
It might be different if the announce was done years ago, and some
people might have missed it. But when it was announced 4 times in the
last three weeks, (and also mentioned many times in
planet.debian.org), you are expected to know about it, or -if you
don't- find out about it before posting any inflamatory messages.
I find all of your latest mails very questionable, and I really fear
that you might not be ready to become a Debian Developer.
--
Besos,
Marga
Reply to: