Re: Bart Martens 2006-09-13 <[🔎] 1158143558.4590.141.camel@localhost> > > <cite>Debian Account Manager and Front Desk Comments > > no package; maintains buildd.net [Myon 2006-06-06] > > waiting for DAM comment [Myon 2006-06-27] > > </cite> > My impression is that Front Desk has > - recorded that you contribute by maintaining buildd.net, > - decided that you don't need an AM for this kind of contributions, > - forwarded your application to DAM for approval. > > Waiting on DAM comment for about 3 months now, which is somewhat surprising > > because I already got a comment from a DAM member in January which states > > (in short): <cite>"Your chances are rather minimal."</cite> Anyway... > > Did this DAM member explain why? Did this DAM member already know that > you contribute without package maintenance? Hi, what happens/happened here is the following: Ingo has historically had some conflict with the (then only) DAM [1]. The above-mentioned DAM-member (who of course knows the full story) comment also indicated that Frontdesk should ask for a formal DAM statement first before we spend AM time on an application that would be likely to be rejected anyway. This statement has not yet arrived, though. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/02/msg00008.html Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature