[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Revoking NM application due to inactivity from Debian



Re: Bart Martens 2006-09-13 <[🔎] 1158143558.4590.141.camel@localhost>
> > <cite>Debian Account Manager and Front Desk Comments
> > no package; maintains buildd.net [Myon 2006-06-06]
> > waiting for DAM comment [Myon 2006-06-27]
> > </cite>

> My impression is that Front Desk has
> - recorded that you contribute by maintaining buildd.net,
> - decided that you don't need an AM for this kind of contributions,
> - forwarded your application to DAM for approval.

> > Waiting on DAM comment for about 3 months now, which is somewhat surprising
> > because I already got a comment from a DAM member in January which states
> > (in short): <cite>"Your chances are rather minimal."</cite> Anyway... 
> 
> Did this DAM member explain why? Did this DAM member already know that
> you contribute without package maintenance?

Hi,

what happens/happened here is the following: Ingo has historically had
some conflict with the (then only) DAM [1]. The above-mentioned
DAM-member (who of course knows the full story) comment also indicated
that Frontdesk should ask for a formal DAM statement first before we
spend AM time on an application that would be likely to be rejected
anyway. This statement has not yet arrived, though.

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2004/02/msg00008.html

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: