Re: RFS: rush
On 4 June 2010 12:12, Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se> wrote:
> fredag den 4 juni 2010 klockan 20:58 skrev Ben Finney detta:
>> Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se> writes:
>>
>> > I am seeking an __active__ sponsor for this package.
>>
>> What distinction are you drawing with that qualifier (???__active__???)?
>> What are you seeking beyond a sponsor for the package?
>
> Well, I had one in the mid of April, he made a quick look, made an excuse
> for making it superficial, and have not been heard of since for this package,
> or for windowlab, which he also accepted.
That would be me. :)
I have been busy, and had to fix my own RC bugs this week - I don't
think I've seen a second version of the 'rush' packaging from you
since I commented on the version in April, although I could just have
missed it. Yes, I should look at windowlab as well, and I should have
acked your mails.
--
Tim Retout <tim@retout.co.uk>
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: rush
- From: Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>
- Re: RFS: rush
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: RFS: rush
- From: Mats Erik Andersson <mats.andersson@gisladisker.se>