Re: buildd is not building my package.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:28:14AM -0500, Carlo Segre wrote:
> If you sent a request to <nonfree@release.debian.NET>, requesting the
> autobuild on the non-free buildd network, that should be enough. As long
> as your justification for why it is legal to let it be autobuilt is
> acceptable.
I already did post an email there. But I'm not a lawyer, so I did not
include a justification other than that my sponsor thought it was ok.
So again: nonfree@release.debian.net, please for the sake of users of
(at least) sparc, ia64, i386 -- auto build the package libcwd.
If there is a problem and this cannot be done - MAIL me with the reason
why not.
--
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
PS It might be that I'm "impatient", I only mailed them recently.
Then that is my fault (probably because I'm myself a very
fast response time guy; I read and answer mails many times
per day, seven days per week, every day (I haven't had a holiday
for 8 years now). A delay of 12 hours is nearly insane for me.
(This is also the reason that I think that a license that asks
people to sent ME patches so I can merge them - OR distribute
patches as PATCHES (next to the original tar ball made by me)
is more than fine). If anyone had a bad experience with support
of libcwd, especially the merging of patches they sent me--
feel free to speak up and ask me again to change the license
to GPL. Otherwise, don't be an ass by treating other volunteers
who aren't using your type of license as shit :/
Reply to: