Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Should I upload with just the change from (1)?
Yes. I agree with your reasoning.
Regards,
Kapil.
--
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: (retired) [RFS] stunnel
- From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>
- [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>
- Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
- Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>
- Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
- Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>
- Re: [RFS] stunnel4 (updated package, adoption, RFS repost)
- From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>