Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)
On 7/27/07, Christoph Haas <haas@debian.org> wrote:
> So if anyone could tell me what features REVU has that m.d.n is lacking
> then I'll consider adding them in the next release. I'm not active in
> Ubuntu so I can't tell how things work there. I just see the commenting
> feature and colorful icons there. ;)
>From a cursory look at both web pages and the REVU wiki pages;
Uploads are based on date/time of the upload rather than version
numbers and all of them are kept.
Automated archiving of uploaded packages (last I checked, there were
still some packages on mentors/sponsor-pkglist that have been
uploaded) - 2 examples are paris-traceroute and monotone
Nice icons for status :)
Automated interdiffs between successive uploads (might be nice to
extend this to the versions in the archive)
Per-upload commenting
I can view the diff.gz files in my browser
Can mark comments as 'advocating an upload'
Unpacked source trees
Lintian/linda output
FTBFS checks
Changes in upstream tarball (mentioned on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU/REVU-Tools)
Source code
checking for a debian/watch
new upstream available?
debian native package?
Would be nice to also have autorejects of packages with broken Build-Depends
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: