On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:49:33 +0530 Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 03:04:31PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > > I've made some changes to your script in order to improve it's > > results. The modified script can be downloaded from here: > > http://files.myopera.com/atomo64/files/mentors_comp.py > > and the results generated by the modified script: > > http://files.myopera.com/atomo64/files/output.test.html > > Very nice! There needs to be some way of indicating which packages have been reviewed but which are not ready for upload. e.g. homebank has been reviewed but is waiting for upstream changes before it will be accepted into Debian. This is a difficult problem because although the initial messages were on debian-mentors, subsequent emails and the rejection methods were not. Maybe mentors.debian.net could have some kind of wiki (or links to pages on wiki.debian.org) to track the status of such packages - the report could then look up such a page and link to that instead of the RFS. It isn't sufficient to use the debian-mentors archive alone - in the case of homebank, the various messages are spread over more than two months of archives and the thread gets lost. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpzTx4NKC0se.pgp
Description: PGP signature