Re: Removing non-free documentation from a package
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Well, the new package will not contain a Perl module, so I do not see the
> need to sticking to the conventions (cf section 4.2 of the Debian Perl
We know what to guess as its name, that along is good enough reason IMHO.
> At any rate, I guess you are suggesting the name
> libparse-recdescent-perl-doc-nonfree, aren't you? Good chances to win
> the longest-package-name contest in Debian :-)
Yes, but that's not a problem (and you can shorten nonfree to nf or somesuch
:-) ).
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: