also sprach Martin Dickopp <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2004.10.27.1842 +0200]: > Both pmount and my package try to solve the same problem -- > letting users access removable media. The difference is that > pmount allows users to mount and unmount these devices manually, > while my script mounts and unmounts them automatically. Given that you require udev anyway, maybe it would be worth to add the hotplug abilities to pmount instead? > Another difference is that pmount requires the user to know the > name of the device node (my script doesn't) uh, because you use udev. > but pmount lets the user choose the mointpoint (my script > doesn't). So, use the best of both worlds and fuse all your cool stuff into pmount. That would be my suggestion. I prefer pmount because it does not require udev. You could add it as an option... -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <email@example.com> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
Description: Digital signature