Re: problem with ldconfig and packaging libs
"Oscar" == Oscar Levi <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 01:35:07AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>> Yes; I think the other advice was rather bad.
> Really. That sounds like a jab. Is there an ego needing a snack?
No, I don't think so. Maybe I wasn't clear.
It is bad advice for someone asking help about fakeroot to tell them
to also use sudo or super. Pick one and one only.
> What is 'bad' about using sudo? If I have a package that needs to
> be owned by root what is wrong with sudo?
> I'm not sure what is to like about fakeroot. It lets me create a
> setuid root program without asking me if I want to grant this
> priviledge to my users. At least sudo has a permission check.
If you even think that Linux itself will even *let* you do this, you
need to do a little RTM'ing.
fakeroot simple *pretends* it is creating files with an ownership of
root or what-have you. It doesn't actually do any such thing. Try it.
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>