May be I was not clear enough. Please *ignore* d-shlibmove for the
moment. What we need first is a shared library since this is mandatory.
If you manage to tweak the build system in a way we can have *.so
**and** *.a then (and only then) we might consider d-shlibmove since it
requires both kind of libs.
I was pointing to libsmithwaterman for binary package names as well
as a potential way to create automake stuff in a patch (but that's
not required).
Sorry if I have dragged you into a to complex dead end street.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de