Hello Andrius, > Did you push everything (git push --all && git push --tags)? Repackaging > should have left commits in 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' branches, as > well as new tags. Without them my build process fail. Other than that > seems fine. How about now? Also, in pristine-tar branch, there are two sets of delta and id files. Should the old one (without +ds) be removed? > I'd expect 'licensecheck' to be able of doing this, but haven't > checked it yet. Unfortunately I haven't had much luck with licensecheck, especially when detecting the type of license used within some src files in the directory. It either ends up blank or displays a FIXME output. > I will be on vacation for a month starting on Monday, but I will stay > on-line most of the time. Most probably I won't have access to my > Debian building machine. Ok. Many thanks, Shayan Doust On 20/07/2019 14:46, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Shayan, > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, 20:45 Shayan Doust, <hello@shayandoust.me > <mailto:hello@shayandoust.me>> wrote: > > Surprisingly, I have never seen that within my Lintian. I've ran lintian > dozens of times and the only outputs are informational spelling > mistakes. This is very strange. My lintian preference has pedantic > output disabled. > > > This is strange, these warnings are not pedantic. For me they emerge > during lintian check as a part of sbuild process. > > Please let me know how my repackaging attempt went. > > > Did you push everything (git push --all && git push --tags)? Repackaging > should have left commits in 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' branches, as > well as new tags. Without them my build process fail. Other than that > seems fine. > > I also realised I had used an incorrect GPL-3 paragraph, hence I have > since rectified this. I'm hoping this is fine now. I'm wondering if > there is a better (maybe regex-dependent) way of automatically inserting > a dot on a blank line instead of doing this manually. > > > I usually copy these paragraphs from my previous packages when I > encounter vanilla GPL-3 and like. Not sure about the automated solution. > I'd expect 'licensecheck' to be able of doing this, but haven't checked > it yet. > > Agreed. I was fairly hesitant to do this a few days ago - not sure why. > However, there are now two packages. > > > Thanks a lot - now we have a lightweight package with executables. > > I am still working on patching a few more of the remaining test sources. > > > Great! > > I will be on vacation for a month starting on Monday, but I will stay > on-line most of the time. Most probably I won't have access to my Debian > building machine. > > Best, > Andrius
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature