Re: Uploaded new version 1.6 of htslib, samtools & bcftools to experimental - any known issues with reverse dependencies
Hi Mattia,
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 01:31:35PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 04:49:36PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Thanks for your careful checking. Would you mind just commiting your
> > prefered solution to make sure I've correctly understood what you mean?
> > (There is no real policy in the med team here.)
>
> I could do that, but I'm unsure as to why you did a thing.
> I'm looking at commit 765419270800864fd29cea90db233a60cd46aea8, where
> with a simple message "install htslib*.mk files that are used in
> bcftools" you did so many changes, including adding a dependency and
> installing a bunch of links. The problem is the first link of that
> list. The commit nor the changelog explains the reason of those
> changes, so I'd rather not remove something that is there for a
> reason...
Sorry for the sloppy commit messages.
> Then, now that the htslib*.mk are not installed anymore
> (commit 5fedaeab7241efc00f5d814ebb67f884d1c62e38) so *maybe* all the
> changes that were done in the same commit could be reverted as well.
I've tested a local build and the means of
765419270800864fd29cea90db233a60cd46aea8 can all be droped. I pushed
two commits - hopefully better documented than before.
Sorry for the confusion
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: