Re: [MoM] incorporating phyutility into the packages
Hi Stephen,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 01:22:19PM -0400, Stephen Smith wrote:
> > If you would have called `lintian -I -i` it would have told you that
> > there were some minus signes inside the manpage where hyphens are
> > expected. Since I was fixing syntactical issues before I did so for now
> > as well. Just a recommendation to use lintian extensively the next
> > time.
>
> Ah, sorry, I missed that. Still new to that tool. Getting there though.
No problem. You will learn that lintian is one of your best friends when
trying to prepare policy conform packages.
> > http://code.google.com/p/prottest3/
> >
> > (which has some start of packaging here:
> >
> > Vcs-Svn: svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/prottest/trunk/
> >
> > and can be moved to Git as well for sure) since the usage of phyutility
> > inside this tool was my initial motivation to dive into phyutility.
>
> Sounds good. I will take that as the next project.
I just ralised that the latest version is not using phyutility any more
(for whatever reason). Just package it if it is interesting for you.
> I have some other
> tools that I would love to get in there that have more complex
> dependencies so it will be good to get more under the belt before then.
Just a warning: prottest has some other binary jars which are not yet
packaged for Debian and it needs to be sorted out which one are needed
and thus need to be packaged or whether some of them might be dropped.
> I will go ahead and dive into this.
Feel free to tackle other projects of yours if you might notice that it
is not as simple as expected and the packages of your own agenda might
seem more urgent for your personal work.
Kind regards and thanks for your work on phyutility
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: