Re: [MoM] incorporating phyutility into the packages
Hi Thorsten
I would be happy to take a look at the copyright contents. However, I am
a bit new to this so not exactly sure which bits are missing. Not trying
to be dense, just not sure. Maybe Andreas or you could point me in the
right direction and I can fix things. Aha, the copyright needs the jebl
authors as well I am guessing?
As for jebl being a separate package, it is a bit complicated. The original
one is no longer maintained (http://sourceforge.net/projects/jebl/) though
this older one is the one that is included in phyutility. Seems like those
sources aren't even available anymore. There is an updated
(https://code.google.com/p/jebl2/) one, but this is not the one used by
phyutility. So from phyutility's perspective, I am not sure it would be
helpful to have jebl2 as a package. Again, new to this, so happy to do
whatever is best.
Take care,
Stephen
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:17:18PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> thanks to Andreas I learned today that I need to write more emails and that
> phyutility is going to be uploaded soon.
> Before this upload, can you please have a closer look at the (yet)
> incomplete contents of debian/copyright.
> Would it make sense to create a separate package from the included jebl
> library?
>
> Thorsten
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.1403162158340.12351@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.1403162158340.12351@tor.gallien.in-chemnitz.de
>
Reply to: