Re: clinica_0.2.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

[Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>]

Le Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:21:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> 
> it was repackages as required by ftpmaster.  Even if it might be
> fine now because git-buildpackage works and is able to create the
> pristine tarball it is not the very best idea to have a different
> tarball without having a get-orig-source target that would create it.

I would also suggest to change its version number, for instance by adding
‘~dfsg’.

  http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices#repackagedorigtargz

 
> Moreover I have a further problem - but that's just me not the packaging
> itself.  To sponsor the package I need to sign it with my key and tried:
> 
>   git-buildpackage --git-keyid="Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>"

--git-keyid is for signing git tags.  I think that to sponsor a package, you
can pass the usual dpkg-buildpackage option directly.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles