Re: RFC: packaging layout for Odin
I missed this one:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:37:42PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
<snip>
> > Without looking again, I see nothing that would demand even two binary
> > packages -- just 'odin' itself.
>
> NAK again. It's just crazy, in terms of package management, having the shared
> libraries and the binaries all in one package :)
What is it exactly that makes it crazy?
Michael
--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050
Reply to: