Re: Nuitka - GPLv3 plus contribution copyright assignment
Kay Hayen <email@example.com> writes:
> And it should address what MJ said, because that way, new code is
> under "ASF2.0" for everybody pretty automatic.
Is that your intent? If so, I don't know why the license is not ASF 2.0
from the start.
On the other hand, if you want everyone to receive the work under GPL
3.0 but *not* have the freedom to re-license, then the above intent
> That way, my only "unfairness" is to not put my work under GPLv3, a
> right that I offer everybody else too though.
I am quite confused by this, probably due to the apparent contradiction
\ “Some people, when confronted with a problem, think ‘I know, |
`\ I'll use regular expressions’. Now they have two problems.” |
_o__) —Jamie Zawinski, in alt.religion.emacs |