Re: Is libreludedb DFSG compliant?
Scripsit Arnoud Engelfriet <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Why on earth do they not just license it as GPL straight away? That
>> would not prevent them from offering other license terms in addition
>> for a fee (or without one) as they see fit.
> They may be worried about whether dynamic linking against their
> software creates a derivative work. With that language, they try to
> take away that worry.
I am aware of that controversy, yet it is not even clear to me in
which direction the proposed language is supposed to resolve it.
Henning Makholm "There is a danger that curious users may
occasionally unplug their fiber connector and look
directly into it to watch the bits go by at 100 Mbps."