Re: Is libreludedb DFSG compliant?
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Why on earth do they not just license it as GPL straight away? That
> would not prevent them from offering other license terms in addition
> for a fee (or without one) as they see fit.
They may be worried about whether dynamic linking against their
software creates a derivative work. With that language, they try to
take away that worry.
Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself
Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/