On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 11:22:39PM -0500, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > I think you'd agree that just running p2c over pascal code serves as > an obfuscation, and the resulting C isn't source. But after you've > made substantial changes, it probably is the source. Yes: if my actual "preferred form for modification" is the Pascal source, then I can't merely convert it to C and pretend. -- Glenn Maynard