Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"

To: Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>
Cc: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, rms@gnu.org
Subject: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 10:58:27 -0400
Message-id: <E1A1S8x-0000QZ-0w@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-to: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <87y8whep14.dlv@wanadoo.fr> (message from Remi Vanicat on Mon, 22 Sep 2003 00:48:39 +0200)
References: <A6D584AE-E9FE-11D7-AAE2-00039317863E@suespammers.org> <E1A0KHU-000228-K9@fencepost.gnu.org> <1063999951.1230.2.camel@bohr> <E1A0pFq-0005ub-Hi@fencepost.gnu.org> <20030920224813.GG12094@donarmstrong.com> <E1A1Clk-0004Ks-0L@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y8whep14.dlv@wanadoo.fr>

    If the whole doc was DFSG free, I believe no Debian maintainer 
    would remove the political statements one could find in it.

Two people have just said they would remove any essay that cannot
be modified.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Andrew Saunders <syntaxis@gmx.co.uk>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>

References:
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
  - From: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
- There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise: a proposal
Next by Date: Re: Starting to talk
Previous by thread: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
Next by thread: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread