Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"

To: rms@gnu.org, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:35:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <20030922.203553.74751779.wlandry@ucsd.edu>
In-reply-to: <E1A1S8x-0000QZ-0w@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1A1Clk-0004Ks-0L@fencepost.gnu.org> <87y8whep14.dlv@wanadoo.fr> <E1A1S8x-0000QZ-0w@fencepost.gnu.org>

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>     If the whole doc was DFSG free, I believe no Debian maintainer 
>     would remove the political statements one could find in it.
> 
> Two people have just said they would remove any essay that cannot
> be modified.

Notice that the first person said "DFSG free", and you said "cannot be
modified".  Those are not the same things.  All parts of a DFSG free
doc can be modified.

Regards,
Walter Landry
wlandry@ucsd.edu

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>

References:
- There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Remi Vanicat <vanicat@debian.org>
- Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
  - From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Unidentified subject!
Next by Date: Re: Starting to talk
Previous by thread: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
Next by thread: Re: There was never a chance of a "GFDL compromise"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread