Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
En réponse à David B Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> > It seems obvious to you that documentation is software. It is not
> > to me. Simply.
> That's fine, but does that mean that you think it's okay for them to
> non-Free in some form or another? (Either by restrictions on use,
> restrictions on modification, restrictions on storage, or what have
You've listed some interesting kinds of restrictions.
Maybe some would be acceptable for documentation under certain
circumstances, out of DFSG of course.