[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)

On Wed, 14 May 2003 16:40:13 +0200 (CEST)
Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> wrote:
> > >   It seems obvious to you that documentation is software. It is
> > >   not to me. Simply.
> > 
> > That's fine, but does that mean that you think it's okay for them to
> > be
> > non-Free in some form or another? (Either by restrictions on use,
> > restrictions on modification, restrictions on storage, or what have
> You've listed some interesting kinds of restrictions.
> Maybe some would be acceptable for documentation under certain
> circumstances, out of DFSG of course.

Have any examples other than copyright notices?

Attachment: pgp0eIZFqSDXn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: