On Wed, 14 May 2003 16:40:13 +0200 (CEST) Jérôme Marant <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > > It seems obvious to you that documentation is software. It is > > > not to me. Simply. > > > > That's fine, but does that mean that you think it's okay for them to > > be > > non-Free in some form or another? (Either by restrictions on use, > > restrictions on modification, restrictions on storage, or what have > > You've listed some interesting kinds of restrictions. > Maybe some would be acceptable for documentation under certain > circumstances, out of DFSG of course. Have any examples other than copyright notices?
Description: PGP signature