Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
En réponse à James Troup <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> email@example.com (Jérôme Marant) writes:
> > As long as I am a GNU Emacs user, I object to see the Emacs manual
> > going to non-free. Currently, it is provided by the emacs package
> > and I'm able to read it from emacs itself as soon as the package
> > is installed.
> > So, from the user point of view, I don't see any benefit of moving
> > it elsewhere.
> Wow! You're so right! Let's get rid of this silly DFSG thing and move
> all software to main, it'd be so much more convenient from a user
> point of view!! Yeesh.
I'm talking about documentation which comes with free software from
GNU. You deliberately removed the last part of my message, and that's
make your reply even more trollish.