[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)



On Tue, 13 May 2003 23:35:10 +0200
jmarant@nerim.net (Jérôme Marant) wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> writes:
> 
> > So does this mean I can include my shareware fonts and my
> > for-educational-use-only documentation in my next package upload? 
> > The software is free, so I guess it's ok to let these other things
> > into main along with it -- right?
> 
>   It seems obvious to you that documentation is software. It is not
>   to me. Simply.

That's fine, but does that mean that you think it's okay for them to be
non-Free in some form or another? (Either by restrictions on use,
restrictions on modification, restrictions on storage, or what have
you? The GFDL has all of these faults. And more I'm sure that I haven't
seen.)

Attachment: pgpoKp15GFx9r.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: