Re: The debate on Invariant sections (long)
Peter S Galbraith <email@example.com> writes:
> I agree with all your points. I think we should move forward moving
> those docs to non-free. It'll mean a few packages from non-free on my
> systems, but if that's what RMS wants it's not a huge deal for me as
> long as they are still available.
As long as I am a GNU Emacs user, I object to see the Emacs manual
going to non-free. Currently, it is provided by the emacs package
and I'm able to read it from emacs itself as soon as the package
So, from the user point of view, I don't see any benefit of moving
I'm not in favour of applying such treatments to GNU documentation
because GNU people will probably never act an evil way with their
I know that everyone should be considered equally but I'm convinced
that the evil will not come from the GNU ...