Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 23:56:22 -0500
Jim Popovitch <jim@k4vqc.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:33 -0500, Marvin Renich wrote:
> > Are you saying that because others have, in the past, resorted to
> > violence that it becomes justifiable?
>
> No, I'm saying lessons learned from History are to always be respected
> and not ignored.
>
> > Over an offer to help that was sent to the wrong place and was thus
> > not answered?
>
> Context, it's always important. The offerS have been given by several
...
> > Sorry, that is just plain wrong.
>
> Which part? The part about context mattering?
Maybe the part implying that revolutionary violence can be appropriate
against listmasters who provide a free service - which you are
perfectly free to opt out of - simply because they fail (in your view)
to provide better anti-spam measures?
This is what you wrote:
> How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? 1
> month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years? At
> what point should constructive feedback yield to insults, and at what
> point should insults yield to violence?
>
> If your answer to that last question is "never", then I suggest you
> study some history. ;-)
Celejar
Reply to: