Re: Acer TM 803 and fan noise
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> However, I'd be interested to know why you chose cpufreqd over
> cpudynd. I use cpudynd but for no particular reason. Is there
> anything that makes cpufreqd actually superior?
I looked at cpufreqd, cpudyn and powernowd.
Powernowd is intentionally limited in its scope, as stated in its README file.
Cpudyn only sets the CPU state (powersave or performance), but not the
frequency. Also, it does not take into account whether the machine is on mains
or on battery.
Cpufreqd is very versatile, and at first its configuration looks complex. It
really makes sense, though, with its clean separation of profiles and rules.
Maybe the fact that Mattia Dongili seems to be Italian helps, too. :^)
Thanks for a well done job, Mattia!
- --
Nicola Larosa - nico@tekNico.net
"Conventional currencies are built to create competition, and
complementary currencies are built to create cooperation and
community, and it's important to be aware that both can be
available to make our exchanges." -- Bernard Lietaer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/+p9mXv0hgDImBm4RAmbAAJ9dVtis42yPqDbTLFQC2WRjLkEp8wCgm0oc
33jhrL2NsjRtajxLzrX8a5M=
=d7Lh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: