On Monday 05 January 2004 06:10, Nicola Larosa wrote: > I would avoid using cpudynd and cpufreqd at the same time, they > would probably step on each other's toes. But surely that's not > what the OP meant. :^) They indeed do seem to step on each other's toes - at least that's what I've experienced. However, I'd be interested to know why you chose cpufreqd over cpudynd. I use cpudynd but for no particular reason. Is there anything that makes cpufreqd actually superior? -- --- Magnus von Koeller --- email: magnus@vonkoeller.de address: International University Campus 9, App. 13 D-76646 Bruchsal / Germany phone: +49-7251-700-659 mobile: +49-179-4562940 web: http://www.vonkoeller.de
Attachment:
pgpOtc29hYBtg.pgp
Description: signature