Re: Description of pyvnc2swf
Vincent Bernat <email@example.com> wrote:
> OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 25 août 2007, vers 12:18, MJ Ray
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> disait:
> > Please mention a couple of those reasons. I *hate* it when a package
> > of tool-that-I-don't-know describes itself as "better than
> > other-tool-that-I-don't-know-and-isn't-even-packaged" without reason.
> Well, this is what the second paragraph is for : pyvnc2swf is actively
> maintained and has more functionalities than vnc2swf.
That's repeating what I'm unhappy with: it "has more functionalities
than" something whose functionality I do not know!
If that is what the second paragraph is for, then make it do it!
In other words: *what* functionality?
Imagine an alien has landed and has never seen vnc2swf - how would you
explain this difference to him/her/it?
Hope that clarifies,
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op.
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/