Hi, On Monday 28 November 2005 10:05, Sven Luther wrote: > ... for a kernel which is aimed at > going away before the etch release anyway... I don't think this is true (for debian as a whole). Sorry. Removing 2.4 is not a etch release goal as defined by the release managers. And it's also neither necessary nor particular useful as 2.6 still lacks some features 2.4 has: some hardware is only supported in 2.4, some firewall related features are only in 2.4 (atm). Maybe there is even more... Joeyh wrote: > > like it might be less work to follow upstream since it's limited to > > security fixes, serious bug fixes, and driver backports, assuming > > merging with it isn't too much work. Ack. I've made up my mind and decided that I'l do (or try to do :-P) the work needed for bringing 2.4.32 in debian. Help is certainly welcome. I'll publish my results as soon as I have some. regards, Holger P.S.: I'm subscribed to -kernel now. cc'ed Joey as I dont know if he is..
Attachment:
pgpv3XBgkwKu0.pgp
Description: PGP signature